I totally agree, the sample code and documentation need updating and it needs to be checked across the board to ensure it is consistent.
Leave it with me 
[import]uid: 84637 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 131782[/import]
Hey Danny,
just to clear your pov - it is very important to fix Docs.
For example: I was making presentation about indie game dev at university few days back. And as a result - 5 students now trying Corona SDK as dev tool. They have expirience with other languages, but first time with Lua.
They ll learn Lua from Corona Docs. But if Corona Docs are failing - there probably will just give up and ll spread word that ‘corona sucks, even their own code dosent work’. And as result - you `ll never get them as clients. Not just that 5 students, but probably whole IT-part of university 'll deny your product.
PS Yes, i know - free version(old) of corona still works with old docs. But just wanna show you example why you should run and fix your Docs =) [import]uid: 90911 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 131792[/import]
Hey efgames.
Don’t worry I totally understand where you are coming from.
I will try to get this sorted out asap.
[import]uid: 84637 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 131796[/import]
Docs are still not updated I noticed today almost two months later. This is the sort of thing that makes us pull our hair out trying to “fix” our code. [import]uid: 160288 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 134579[/import]
Docs are still not updated I noticed today almost two months later. This is the sort of thing that makes us pull our hair out trying to “fix” our code. [import]uid: 160288 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 134579[/import]
Docs still not updated. Took me 15 minutes of googling until I found this thread and the solution. [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142950[/import]
@kreso,
Are you referring to this page?
http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
If so, all of the docs on that page are outdated and I cannot assure that they’re accurate. They are only kept “active” for legacy purposes, but we might pull them down soon.
At this time, I am (personally) updating most of our guides, but this process will require a considerable amount of time, as it involves most (or all) of the libraries and events in Corona.
In the meantime, the most current API-specific reference can be found here:
http://docs.coronalabs.com/api/
With that in mind, if you find any errors in the API reference, please let us know by using the “feedback buttons” at the bottom of any API page. If we don’t know about an error, we aren’t likely to stumble upon it and fix it… so we request your help in pointing it out. It takes just a moment to click the proper button and submit a report.
Sincerely,
Brent Sorrentino [import]uid: 200026 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142956[/import]
Hi Brent, and thanks for the prompt reply. Appreciate it!
Yes, that is the address I used. http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
Thanks for letting me know.
There is a thing I am usually wondering (not only Corona but other, much ‘bigger’ sites as well).
1st there is no date on the docs, and secondly - if you know that is old stuff - why not just put a header or something that says 'This is deprecated, for new stuff go there ->".
That is only me thinking out loud. Happened more than once visiting Adobe’s docs for example (or Facebook), reading a ‘fix’ to only find out after few hours of meddling with it that it was a fix 2 years old (no date anywhere, no info that it might be old).
Also, it might be interesting to mention - I find docs using google, not following your website’s search/links. I think many people do the same (or I might be wrong).
And there is even a notification on top of page about newest build. If you can have that there - then you can have some other info as well? that is kinda important for us, google-ers. 
Thanks for listening!
Kreso [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142958[/import]
Docs still not updated. Took me 15 minutes of googling until I found this thread and the solution. [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142950[/import]
@kreso,
Are you referring to this page?
http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
If so, all of the docs on that page are outdated and I cannot assure that they’re accurate. They are only kept “active” for legacy purposes, but we might pull them down soon.
At this time, I am (personally) updating most of our guides, but this process will require a considerable amount of time, as it involves most (or all) of the libraries and events in Corona.
In the meantime, the most current API-specific reference can be found here:
http://docs.coronalabs.com/api/
With that in mind, if you find any errors in the API reference, please let us know by using the “feedback buttons” at the bottom of any API page. If we don’t know about an error, we aren’t likely to stumble upon it and fix it… so we request your help in pointing it out. It takes just a moment to click the proper button and submit a report.
Sincerely,
Brent Sorrentino [import]uid: 200026 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142956[/import]
Hi Brent, and thanks for the prompt reply. Appreciate it!
Yes, that is the address I used. http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
Thanks for letting me know.
There is a thing I am usually wondering (not only Corona but other, much ‘bigger’ sites as well).
1st there is no date on the docs, and secondly - if you know that is old stuff - why not just put a header or something that says 'This is deprecated, for new stuff go there ->".
That is only me thinking out loud. Happened more than once visiting Adobe’s docs for example (or Facebook), reading a ‘fix’ to only find out after few hours of meddling with it that it was a fix 2 years old (no date anywhere, no info that it might be old).
Also, it might be interesting to mention - I find docs using google, not following your website’s search/links. I think many people do the same (or I might be wrong).
And there is even a notification on top of page about newest build. If you can have that there - then you can have some other info as well? that is kinda important for us, google-ers.
Thanks for listening!
Kreso [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142958[/import]
Well done on making the redirect! [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 144040[/import]
Well done on making the redirect! [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 144040[/import]
Docs still not updated. Took me 15 minutes of googling until I found this thread and the solution. [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142950[/import]
@kreso,
Are you referring to this page?
http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
If so, all of the docs on that page are outdated and I cannot assure that they’re accurate. They are only kept “active” for legacy purposes, but we might pull them down soon.
At this time, I am (personally) updating most of our guides, but this process will require a considerable amount of time, as it involves most (or all) of the libraries and events in Corona.
In the meantime, the most current API-specific reference can be found here:
http://docs.coronalabs.com/api/
With that in mind, if you find any errors in the API reference, please let us know by using the “feedback buttons” at the bottom of any API page. If we don’t know about an error, we aren’t likely to stumble upon it and fix it… so we request your help in pointing it out. It takes just a moment to click the proper button and submit a report.
Sincerely,
Brent Sorrentino [import]uid: 200026 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142956[/import]
Hi Brent, and thanks for the prompt reply. Appreciate it!
Yes, that is the address I used. http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
Thanks for letting me know.
There is a thing I am usually wondering (not only Corona but other, much ‘bigger’ sites as well).
1st there is no date on the docs, and secondly - if you know that is old stuff - why not just put a header or something that says 'This is deprecated, for new stuff go there ->".
That is only me thinking out loud. Happened more than once visiting Adobe’s docs for example (or Facebook), reading a ‘fix’ to only find out after few hours of meddling with it that it was a fix 2 years old (no date anywhere, no info that it might be old).
Also, it might be interesting to mention - I find docs using google, not following your website’s search/links. I think many people do the same (or I might be wrong).
And there is even a notification on top of page about newest build. If you can have that there - then you can have some other info as well? that is kinda important for us, google-ers.
Thanks for listening!
Kreso [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142958[/import]
Docs still not updated. Took me 15 minutes of googling until I found this thread and the solution. [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142950[/import]
@kreso,
Are you referring to this page?
http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
If so, all of the docs on that page are outdated and I cannot assure that they’re accurate. They are only kept “active” for legacy purposes, but we might pull them down soon.
At this time, I am (personally) updating most of our guides, but this process will require a considerable amount of time, as it involves most (or all) of the libraries and events in Corona.
In the meantime, the most current API-specific reference can be found here:
http://docs.coronalabs.com/api/
With that in mind, if you find any errors in the API reference, please let us know by using the “feedback buttons” at the bottom of any API page. If we don’t know about an error, we aren’t likely to stumble upon it and fix it… so we request your help in pointing it out. It takes just a moment to click the proper button and submit a report.
Sincerely,
Brent Sorrentino [import]uid: 200026 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142956[/import]
Hi Brent, and thanks for the prompt reply. Appreciate it!
Yes, that is the address I used. http://developer.coronalabs.com/reference/index/analytics
Thanks for letting me know.
There is a thing I am usually wondering (not only Corona but other, much ‘bigger’ sites as well).
1st there is no date on the docs, and secondly - if you know that is old stuff - why not just put a header or something that says 'This is deprecated, for new stuff go there ->".
That is only me thinking out loud. Happened more than once visiting Adobe’s docs for example (or Facebook), reading a ‘fix’ to only find out after few hours of meddling with it that it was a fix 2 years old (no date anywhere, no info that it might be old).
Also, it might be interesting to mention - I find docs using google, not following your website’s search/links. I think many people do the same (or I might be wrong).
And there is even a notification on top of page about newest build. If you can have that there - then you can have some other info as well? that is kinda important for us, google-ers.
Thanks for listening!
Kreso [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 142958[/import]
Well done on making the redirect! [import]uid: 4294 topic_id: 33083 reply_id: 144040[/import]