I’m not sure why we should remove it. People are using it as is. We might get to it but for now, we have a engineering team loaded with higher importance tasks.
Rob
I’m not sure why we should remove it. People are using it as is. We might get to it but for now, we have a engineering team loaded with higher importance tasks.
Rob
It’d be completly ok if the documentation clearly stated that this or that feature is experimental. Or in this case, what properties of other fills don’t work on camera fills.
I see ‘wow, cool feature camera fill’, fiddle around with it for one or two hours to realize it’s just not ready yet.
At the bottom of the docs page is a button that will let the folks working on the docs that it needs updated. If you wouldn’t mind asking them to update it to say it’s experimental.
Thanks
Rob
half a year later the camera fill thing is still considered experimental?
Please corona! If you know it’s broken and incomplete, don’t tell us about it, so we don’t waste our time with it.
No rotation and scaling of camera fill => unusable. Take it out or complete it please
I’m not sure why we should remove it. People are using it as is. We might get to it but for now, we have a engineering team loaded with higher importance tasks.
Rob
It’d be completly ok if the documentation clearly stated that this or that feature is experimental. Or in this case, what properties of other fills don’t work on camera fills.
I see ‘wow, cool feature camera fill’, fiddle around with it for one or two hours to realize it’s just not ready yet.
At the bottom of the docs page is a button that will let the folks working on the docs that it needs updated. If you wouldn’t mind asking them to update it to say it’s experimental.
Thanks
Rob