A little background. Some years back I wrote for the Palm OS. I got in at about the right time, and I made money with one of the apps I distributed. For me, a significant amount of money.
But I did find one strange thing in pricing. Price too low, and your app won’t sell. Too high won’t either, but the low pricing always confused me. What I finally figured out, after reading and discussions and some thought of my own, was that if an app was priced too low (but not free), people didn’t think of it as a quality application and wouldn’t buy it. There was a sweet spot in app pricing, and it completely depended on the app itself.
So, I’m trying to figure out how to price my next app.
I’m getting close to releasing another game for iOS and Android. I wouldn’t have written another game, but I found an idea that wasn’t yet represented in the app store.
And, I look at pricing. It seems that very nearly all the games with high download numbers are 99 cents. Sure, there are a few higher, but not that many. I’m relatively sure that my app doesn’t have the appeal of, say, Angry Birds, on the other hand I’m also sure there is some desire for it out there.
Finally, I also need to factor something else in. I have to be completely honest with myself. If my app is anything like a success, others will jump in, and some of those people have many more resources than I, as an independent developer, can bring to the table.
So, the big question is, do you charge 99 cents, hoping for volume, and hoping that people don’t think it’s just another cheap, poorly written app, or, do you charge $3.00 and try to make back what you put into it, knowing that you’ll get fewer sales?
The competition in games is so severe that I know it’s difficult to make anything, so I need to price in a way that will get me the most revenue.
Or is it much simpler? It will either be a success and make a significant amount of money, or it won’t make any, and so I might as well charge the lower price just to try to get people to buy?
Sean.
[import]uid: 4993 topic_id: 8153 reply_id: 308153[/import]