Apple reviewers using static analyzer on submitted content?

Solar2D General Questions/Discussion
#1

I heard (from a colleague) that Apple has begun running a (static) analyzer on submitted appStore content looking for what they might interpret as “bad behavior” (private method access).

What does this mean for the Corona product on the iPhone platform (if anything)?

Have developers begun to see any recent rejections based on any work they have done using Corona?

To me, this move seems suspiciously targeted at one specific company, which is not Ansca, but I’m curious what the effect will be across the board with 3rd party app dev tools that target iPhone. [import]uid: 177 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 300206[/import]

#2

Scott,

we don’t call any private methods, don’t allow for any code to execute outside of the corona environment, and above all, with Corona, you must use the iPhone SDK to sign your app with your Apple certificate, thus, adhering much more closely to the Apple SDK licensing agreement.

we have not heard of any Corona developer being rejected for “private method access”.

Hope this helps.

Carlos [import]uid: 24 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 241[/import]

#3

I just had a game approved earlier today. [import]uid: 70 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 251[/import]

#4

Great! What is the name of your app?
[import]uid: 3396 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 252[/import]

#5

Let us know the app name so we can post it on our customers show page on our corporate site

carlos [import]uid: 24 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 253[/import]

#6

The app is named Flip 'Em Off!

It’s a fairly simple lights out clone.

http://www.appsbynick.com/flipemoff [import]uid: 70 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 255[/import]

#7

Very cool. [import]uid: 3396 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 257[/import]

#8

Mine just got approved as well. I have two more in review status. [import]uid: 3396 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 258[/import]

#9

Congratulations

Chad, let us know the name of the app so we can put it up on our customer page.

Thanks

Carlos [import]uid: 24 topic_id: 206 reply_id: 260[/import]