Source/version control has been asked for in the past and the main reason it hasn’t been added is because I don’t care about it.
Okay, I care, but in a theoretical way. I’ve been thankful for version control a couple times in the past when it’s saved me when I did something stupid, but it’s been enough of a hassle that I *don’t* use it unless I’m forced to (client requirement, etc.)
I do have Time Machine running, I also back up to Amazon S3 using Arq, and I manually throw things in Dropbox a few times a week, so I’m not working without a net.
The problem with adding source control to CPM is that I’m coming from a neophyte position – I could very easily do it wrong.
For example, I know that a few years ago Subversion was all the rage. But recently all I hear about is Git. So which do I implement? Or do I have to put in both? And if I do that, what other version control systems are out there that would need to be put in as well?
CPM doesn’t store your source files – it only keeps info about the assets. My plan has been to add automatic backup to the database (to Dropbox or via FTP to your server) but the people wanting version control are wanting more than just a backup.
So, you people who know all about version control, and know about CPM, could you fill me in on how you think it should work (from a user standpoint of course)?
And, which version control system should I be aiming at?
Thanks for the feedback.
Jay
[import]uid: 9440 topic_id: 13895 reply_id: 313895[/import]