Different transitions performance between corona and apple simulator

Hi everyone.

I am testing my app, and i move some objects with transitions, and i am seeing that it create some lagg on the app at the time that the transitions is running, it is not fluid, on the corona simulator it works great but on the apple ios simulator it have a little lag, my transitions are normal and dont use any complex animation or long time. it is a exemple:

transition.to(Button, { time = 1400, x = (\_W\*(-0.3)), y = \_H\*0.1, transition = easing.outExpo } )  

It is to get the button out of the screen, can i clean or do something to resolve this lag on the xcode simulator? [import]uid: 26056 topic_id: 23701 reply_id: 323701[/import]

I have the same problem. Using Corona 704b and Storyboard.

And the performance with the iOS simulator in retina display mode is terrible! :frowning:
[import]uid: 69841 topic_id: 23701 reply_id: 95268[/import]

i am using 704A, director and on the pause system and score system i am using with popUps [import]uid: 26056 topic_id: 23701 reply_id: 95276[/import]

I have the same problem. Corona Version 772
In the ipad retina simulator works well. More or less good. Transitions which have accelerated as though they have lost fluency.
In the Xcode simulator works very slow and bad.
That may be happening? [import]uid: 101993 topic_id: 23701 reply_id: 95292[/import]

Yes. we are aware and we are looking into it. But as always, check performance on device. Regardless… There is no slowdown nor reports of slowdown on device only on XCode sim.

C
[import]uid: 24 topic_id: 23701 reply_id: 95465[/import]

The slowdown in the Xcode 4.3.1 iOS simulator is a know problem and has nothing to do with Corona. We tested some Xcode sample apps that show the same problem.

Please file a bug with Apple about this so they can address the problem. The more people who do this will make Apple address the issue. If you complain on the forums about it and don’t file a bug, it probably won’t be fixed. [import]uid: 7559 topic_id: 23701 reply_id: 95490[/import]