I don’t want this to sound pushy or selfish in any way, so… Just so you know. I would, however, like a staff comment on this, if it’s not too much to ask
I love Corona. The engine is great, the API is great, the community is great - everything’s great. I like the way Corona does the free version, and above all, I LOVE the ease of use.
However.
There are a number of things I’ll need from Corona in order for me to stay. I say this because it appears Graphics 2.0 is only going to be available to subscribers. That’s fine - the Corona team has got to make money somehow, and they’ve done a great thing with giving much of the engine away free. But there are some requirements that I’ll need in non-subscriber version (not being in the position to pay $350 per year for a subscription) that will be the basic upgrades. Here they are:
Corner positioning of images
Get pixel color
Basic shaders (blur, etc.)
Polygons
These are some things that I feel are required if Corona still wants free-version subscribers (who might someday become pro users) - like me. If these aren’t added, what does Corona have over LÖVE? It’s completely free, opensource, and has most of these (if not all, I’ve not looked into LÖVE much) already. Sure, there are some usability issues, but those can easily be remedied with a wrapper library. Then, if you’ve got a good wrapper, you get a game engine (with no pro-tier vs. free-tier drawbacks) with the same usability as Corona and the same functionality - that’s also completely free and open-source.
Right ho, just thought I’d put my two cents in.
- Caleb