I load up an image that is 512x512 and when I print out its property values I see:
x,y: 240, 240
xMin,yMin,xMax,yMax: 0, 0, 480, 480
width,height: 480, 480
xOrigin,yOrigin: 240, 240
xReference,yReference: 0, 0 Shouldn’t those "240"s be "255"s, and those "480"s be "512"s ?
Note, the image displays fine. [import]uid: 1581 topic_id: 189 reply_id: 300189[/import]
Can you send me the image and code snipplet ?
Carlos [import]uid: 24 topic_id: 189 reply_id: 212[/import]
Hmmmm, … I just noticed that my 512x512 image is being loaded/displayed as 480x480.
I load up a 256x256 image and the image is loaded/displayed as a 256x256.
So the question becomes:
Why is the 512x512 image being scaled to 480x480? [import]uid: 1581 topic_id: 189 reply_id: 214[/import]
We scale to fit the screen. That’s why.
Maybe that should not be the default. We should have a parameter that autoscales.
Carlos
[import]uid: 24 topic_id: 189 reply_id: 215[/import]
For the sake of completeness, here’s the project which loads up the two images and logs out their stats:
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/105420/Corona%20Samples/512x512_Loaded_As_480x480.zip
Notice, I’ve placed a magenta line at the top and bottom of the 512x512 image.
As to the fact that Corona is scaling the image to screen size: I totally agree with NOT doing that by default. If the user wants it scaled, let’em scale it themselves. [import]uid: 1581 topic_id: 189 reply_id: 216[/import]
We will add this as a bug and feature request an extra parameter to NOT autoscale.
Carlos
ps: nice images.
[import]uid: 24 topic_id: 189 reply_id: 217[/import]