Sorry @ggurak but you said “the execution is lacking; feels dated, gives the wrong message about the usability of the product and dare i say, it feels cold. i think the logo should be inviting, warm and give an impression of “easy to use” nature” and I’m just not seeing any anything about your own logo that counters this opinion?
It’s fine to dislike the new logo - the world would be boring if we all liked the same things and so we’ll never have something that everybody feels is perfect - but I’m just a bit baffled by your submission. Why does the 2D placement give an “ignite and science feel”, and why is “a science feel” important? What’s welcoming about lowercase? What makes your logo more modern than the chosen submission? How does your logo give the impression of “easy to use”?
Submissions are closed and Solar2D has its logo so this isn’t particularly important really and I’m not trying to antagonise. I just feel that if you’re going to post such a strong judgement of the winning submission and then your own concept, you kind of need that concept to nail the criteria you’ve outlined.