Widget 2.0 Stepper Acceleration

Is there a way to set the Steppers “Acceleration” … that is if you hold the stepper down it starts going faster and faster but the time it takes for it to start moving along at a reasonable clip is too long in my situation.

 

Seems like it would make a reasonable parameter to the API:

 

  • Delay on acceleration

  • acceleration factor

 

 

or somethings like that.

 

Getting the Widgets 2.0 in proper working order is surely more important but wondering if there might be something to address this already which is not documented.

 

Cheers,

 

Hi @mslack,

These are both reasonable feature requests. Let me check into how soon these could be rolled into a daily build.

 

Brent

Is there a way to set the Steppers “Acceleration” … that is if you hold the stepper down it starts going faster and faster but the time it takes for it to start moving along at a reasonable clip is too long in my situation.

Seems like it would make a reasonable parameter to the API:

  • Delay on acceleration

  • acceleration factor

or somethings like that.

Getting the Widgets 2.0 in proper working order is surely more important but wondering if there might be something to address this already which is not documented.

Cheers,

I haven’t as yet exposed this functionality but I fully agree that I should. If you could [buglink] simply stating what you already mentioned in this post, then it will get assigned to my list of things to do for widget 2.1

Thanks :slight_smile:

Hi @mslack,

These are both reasonable feature requests. Let me check into how soon these could be rolled into a daily build.

 

Brent

Is there a way to set the Steppers “Acceleration” … that is if you hold the stepper down it starts going faster and faster but the time it takes for it to start moving along at a reasonable clip is too long in my situation.

Seems like it would make a reasonable parameter to the API:

  • Delay on acceleration

  • acceleration factor

or somethings like that.

Getting the Widgets 2.0 in proper working order is surely more important but wondering if there might be something to address this already which is not documented.

Cheers,

I haven’t as yet exposed this functionality but I fully agree that I should. If you could [buglink] simply stating what you already mentioned in this post, then it will get assigned to my list of things to do for widget 2.1

Thanks :slight_smile: