What would say if I were to tell you that we can get up to 4.5x the current performance of Android 2.2 with some proposed changes we have internally?
There is a tiny caveat.
Do you guys want up to 4.5x performance improvement on Android 2.2
A) Yes I want my games to run 4.5x faster and also include bug fixes.
B) No. I don’t want my apps to run 4.5x faster. I just want bugs fixed.
C) Stop smoking the Colombian weed and get to work.
D) What’s the caveat?
E) I want the 4.5x performance improvements I don’t care the caveat.
Carlos
**** PLEASE NOTE **** 4.5x faster is subject to game logic and other elements running in your game. It is an internal benchmark test we noticed. Adding sound, hundreds of flying objects, collisions, large images, scrolling, sprites, particles, all other relevant game imaging and logic will decrease any performance on any hardware. But overall, performance should be a lot better than what it is now. Performance benchmarks are also affected by device, larger screen size and battery life, apps running in the background, plus a bunch of other things that we may not have any control over. Get it?
How is that for a disclaimer. I can just imagine the sort of emails if I don’t put this disclaimer…
You dont know what JIT is and you managed to develop a game engine? Not very professional.
Overall your whole post seems to be unprofessional.
“Do you guys want up to 4.5x performance improvement on Android 2.2”
What’s that? You know Corona Android performance is very bad. Nearly every engine out there has better performance and they are free. In my opinion it was necessary to release such a bugfix weeks earlier!
Just my thoughts… [import]uid: 36789 topic_id: 7422 reply_id: 26268[/import]
It’s a function in Android 2.2 And has nothing to do with you, it’s rom-based and only works if the rom developer have add that functionality i belive.
And it doesn’t mather if the APK build is for 2.1 or 2.2 so far JIT matters, it’s how the OS on the phone works, not the APK. Just speculations but i think it works like that. [import]uid: 9577 topic_id: 7422 reply_id: 26319[/import]