just to let you know: eCPM is between 5-6$ easily on iOS.
We will probably go with AdRally for our next big project.
just to let you know: eCPM is between 5-6$ easily on iOS.
We will probably go with AdRally for our next big project.
i can confirm the ecpm for my android app raised up to 5.34$
also im looking again in AdMob, seems they also increased lot for banner and interstitial.
any reports from you about admob?
wow, that’s also a great ecpm for android!
regarding admob: have been using it, but got very low ecpm. but i didnt have a lot of impressions, so hard to tell.
but if adrally gives 5$+ on both platforms, its great to go with for sure.
Do you have any comparison with Chartboost?
My eCPM with Chartboost is about $2+ monthly average.
hi ingemar,
android chartboost:
2013-10
Google Play
100,318
200,329
326,728
18,167
5.56%
188
1.03%
$238.71
$0.73
so a eCPM of 0.73$ for 330k impressions in one month. But usually i get a 2$ ecpm with chartboost.
maybe 2-3$ on ios.
so as it seems right now, adrally outperforms chartboost, at least for me. but for sure i really do need more impressions with adrally
yesterday i hit an ecpm of 8$ with adrally on ios, so its like 6$ now on average. if it stays like this, awesome.
android went down a bit, its more like 2$ on average.
maybe some others have some stats too?
Thanks @dingo.
It looks promising. Once AdRally goes live it looks like something I should seriously consider.
the only Problem I see for now with AdRally.
It shows me nice eCPM from around 5$
BUT, at the same time i see Dau/View Ratio from around 5:1 … so what in my case would mean (only one fullscreen per day)
a fillrate from 20% !!!
Even if it gives better ecpm with this fillrate. Applovin for example gives me 4$ but with a much higher fillrate.
Therefore overall Profit is still better with AppLovin as it looks like.
This I/We have to consider.
how is ur experience in that?
Greets
Chris
Ok, checked again…
seems with AdRally i have a 3:1 DAU/VIEWS what means for me a 30% Fillrate.
At AppLovin I had 4.92$ ecpm with 100% Fillrate, compared to AdRally 5…49$ ecpm with 30% Fillrate
Therefore I get a 492:164 or a exactly 3:1 Applovin:Adrally PROFIT!!!
Dont come blind with high eCpms, Fillrate is also very important.
Whats ur experience?
Therefore I have a big Question to Corona:
Will u give us now a AppLovin Plugin, or because Corona came bought by Fuse (AdRally) we can completly forget about.
For ur Users, us, it really looks we would have a great Deal also with AppLovin.
Hope U give an answer.
Greets
chris
I agree. Filtrate is very important. Do you know the distribution of your users?
For example do you get 30% filtrate even for users in North America? The low fillrate reminds me of iAds.
hi guruk
i have 1.2 views per DAU.
but maybe you deliver much more impressions?
but yes, basically a mediaton ad network should be able to deliver a 100% fill rate…
Yes should be I have 80% Users from US Will See, i switched back to 90% Applovin to see if my theory is right . If not would loose around 35% income ! Really hope corona offers soon a applovin plugin And for testing Adrally gives a minimum 90% fill rate
To clarify, DAU/View does not equal fill in AdRally. DAU is collected from the startSession callback while views are collected directly from our ad partners.
I understand,
but in my case its exactly like that:
App Starts (StartSession) and ONE Fullscreen per Day.
Therefor I can say exactly how many Requests and how many Impressions…
So here its StartSession = Request … and as its not more than one Fullscreen … one FullScreen = 1 View.
so its a great indicator for FILLRATE True or not
And even I would be the happiest about… its just 3:1 … Three AppStarts give me one View.
We’ve opened up the AdRally plugin forum. I’m going to move this to the forum.
Rob
Guruk - DAU/View is not a reliable measure of fill rate within AdRally. In the case if showing 1 ad a day, unless you show an ad at startup (highly recommended) it is entirely possible to experience a session without experiencing a view.
AdRally does not currently offer any visibility into fill rate, this is however something we will certainly look into for future releases.
tlong thanks for your answers.
i think its really important to know the number of ad requests, or at least to have the chance to use another provider when a request fails.
we do not need to see a 100% fillrate, but need to have options to get a good revenue.
@tlong: how can we know that we are not “wasting” any impressions? eCPM is great so far, but what about fill rate? I would love to at least be able to fill up with different ads.
thanks!
Do you mean there’s no callback when there are no ads available?
That’s a serious flaw in my book. I find it difficult to believe that they can have 100% fill rate in every market. I don’t have to see the actual filtrate recorded anywhere, but I expect to get a callback when an ad request hasn’t been able to be filled at least.
I guess i need to correct my statements after reviewing the plugin.
adrally.checkLoaded()
if none is loaded, we could show an ad from a different provider.
So the question is only about the fillrate now
Phew, that’s a relief! With this news AdRally is back on my to-do list once the plugin is available.
Just a quick question. Is the AdRally plugin you’re testing part of the ads.* API, or is it separate?